The Ontario Racing Commission (the “Commission”) was successful in its appeal from the Divisional Court’s Judicial Review decision overturning the Commission’s earlier decision finding Austin guilty of having provided an improper (cold) urine sample
Administrative law – Decisions of administrative tribunals – Horse Racing – Drivers – Testing for illegal substances – Horse racers – Disciplinary proceedings – Professional misconduct or conduct unbecoming – Hearings – Evidence – Judicial review – Bias Austin v. Ontario (Racing Commission), [2007] O.J. No. 3249, Ontario Court of Appeal, August 30, 2007, M. Rosenberg, ...