SKCA upholds Labour Relations Board decision that complainant under the repealed OHS Act could release an employer with respect to any past wrongdoing that is personal to the complainant

20. December 2017 0
Appeal from decision of Saskatchewan Labour Relations Board regarding whether a complainant under employment legislation could release an employer with respect to wrongdoing that occurred in the past and is personal to the complainant rather than systemic in nature. Administrative law – Decisions reviewed – Labour and employment boards – Appeals – Employment – Termination ...

The applicant landlord unsuccessfully sought leave to appeal a decision of the Residential Tenancies Commission which required him to pay compensation to the respondent tenants

27. May 2014 0
Administrative law – Decisions of administrative tribunals – Residential Tenancy office – Landlord and tenant – Termination – Judicial review – Appeals – Leave to appeal – Compliance with legislation – Hearings – Procedural requirements and fairness Chong v. Wan, [2014] M.J. No. 97, 2014 MBCA 35, Manitoba Court of Appeal, April 16, 2014, B.M. ...

Applicant unsuccessfully applied to set aside a decision of the Rentalsman who had refused to issue a Notice to Quit on the respondent tenant due to improvements made to the property. Decision was held to be within range of acceptable outcomes and reasonable.

26. March 2013 0
Administrative law – Decisions of administrative tribunals – Residential Tenancy office – Landlord and tenant – Rules and by-laws – Conduct of tenant – Residential tenancy agreements – Termination – Judicial review – Compliance with legislation – Jurisdiction – Standard of review – Reasonableness simpliciter Nethervue Park Ltd. v. MacKinnon, [2013] N.B.J. No. 21, 2013 ...

A tenant in a Metro Vancouver Housing Corporation townhouse applied for judicial review of the decision of a dispute resolution officer who found that a 10-day notice to end tenancy for unpaid rent, under Section 46(1) of the Residential Tenancy Act should be upheld with the result that the tenant would lose possession

23. October 2012 0
Administrative law – Decisions of administrative tribunals – Residential Tenancy office – Discretion of court – Landlord and tenant – Residential tenancy agreements – Termination – Vacation notices – Conduct of tenant – Judicial review – Compliance with legislation – Procedural requirements and fairness – Standard of review – Patent unreasonableness – Remedies – Relief from ...

A landlord (Fok) was unsuccessful on judicial review of a decision of a dispute resolution officer under the Residential Tenancy Act, which had ordered the landlords to pay compensation to their former tenants for missing jewellery, and had denied the landlords’ claim for losses associated with repair, garbage disposal and cleaning, and found against them as to whether they had a legal right to change the locks and to retake actual possession of the rental unit

28. December 2010 0
Administrative law – Decisions of administrative tribunals – Residential Tenancy office – Landlord and tenant – Residential tenancy agreements – Conduct of tenant – Termination – Tenant’s goods – Damages – Judicial review – Evidence – Jurisdiction – Standard of review – Patent unreasonableness – Test Fok v. British Columbia (Residential Tenancy Act, Dispute Resolution ...

The Applicant, a housing co-operative, successfully argued that its decision to terminate an individual’s membership and occupancy rights was both reasonable and fair. In accordance with this finding, the court issued a Writ of Possession in favour of the housing co-operative.

27. April 2010 0
Administrative law – Housing co-operative – Governance – Membership – Termination – Judicial review – Procedural requirements and fairness – Natural justice – Compliance with legislation Forestwood Co-operative Homes Inc. v. Blake, [2010] O.J. No. 678, 2010 ONSC 1179, Ontario Superior Court of Justice, February 22, 2010, D.G. Price J. The Applicant, Forestwood Co-operative Homes ...

The Court granted a petition for judicial review of a decision of the Residential Tenancy Branch, which had ordered the Respondent landlord to pay $1,500 in damages to his former tenant, the petitioner. The petitioner had complained that his landlord had unlawfully disposed of his personal possessions while he was away from his apartment. The statutory obligations of the landlord under section 25(1) of the Residential Tenancy Act, in relation to abandoned goods, did not apply to the facts. The dispute resolution officer’s decision to award damages based on the irrelevant consideration of non-existent statutory breaches by the landlord, without considering the tenant’s rights as a bailor at common law, was patently unreasonable.

26. January 2010 0
Administrative law – Decisions of administrative tribunals – Residential Tenancy office – Landlord and tenant – Residential tenancy agreements – Termination – Tenant’s goods – Bailee – Damages – Judicial review – Compliance with legislation Bello v. Ren, [2009] B.C.J. No. 2323, 2009 BCSC 1598, British Columbia Supreme Court, November 23, 2009, L. Fenlon J. ...

The application by a tenant (“Ganitano”) for judicial review of a decision and Order of a residential tenancy dispute resolution officer dismissing Ganitano’s application to dispute a 10-day notice and one-month notice to end tenancy was allowed where the Court found there were a number of procedurally significant problems in the Hearing which infringed Ganitano’s right to be heard on the application

28. July 2009 0
Administrative law – Decisions of administrative tribunals – Residential Tenancy office – Adjudication – Landlord and tenant – Residential tenancy agreements – Termination – Hearings – Conduct of hearings – Failure to provide transcript of hearing – Judicial review – Procedural requirements and fairness – Limitations Ganitano v. Metro Vancouver Housing Corp., [2009] B.C.J. No. ...

A tenant (“Sullivan”) was successful in appealing the dismissal of her petition for judicial review of an arbitration decision that dismissed her claim to set aside a notice to terminate her tenancy. The arbitrator had dismissed Sullivan’s claim for failing to apply within the time limit. The Court of Appeal held that it was unfair of the arbitrator not to canvass the question of an extension of time with the lay litigant.

23. August 2005 0
Administrative law – Landlord and tenant – Residential tenancy agreements – Termination – Arbitration – Limitations – Extension of time – Judicial review – Natural justice – Procedural requirements and fairness Sullivan v. Strata Plan BCS-251, [2005] B.C.J. No. 1350, British Columbia Court of Appeal, June 17, 2005, Ryan, Mackenzie and Low JJ.A. In the course of ...

The Ontario Court of Appeal set aside the Superior Court’s Order requiring the Appellants to vacate a residential premises, on the basis that the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal had exclusive jurisdiction to make such an Order

28. June 2005 0
Administrative law – Landlord and tenant – Residential tenancy agreements – Termination – Judicial review – Jurisdiction of court – Remedies – Injunctions – Availability Beach v. Mofatt, [2005] O.J. No. 1722, Ontario Court of Appeal, May 3, 2005, M.A. Catzman, M. Rosenberg and R.G. Juriansz JJ.A. The Appellants were the residential tenants of an illegal rooming ...