A paralegal was unsuccessful in his motion for stay of suspension of a licence to practice

22. March 2011 0
Administrative law – Decisions of administrative tribunals – Law Societies – Paralegals – Licence to practice – Accreditation – Misrepresentation – Stay of suspension – Public interest – Judicial review – Rules and by-laws – Interpretation Vincent v. Law Society of Upper Canada, [2011] O.J. No. 397, 2011 ONSC 476, Ontario Superior Court of Justice, ...

A family physician (“Dr. Litchfield”) obtained an Order suspending the decision of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta (the “College”) pending a statutory appeal of the College’s decision to strike his name from the College register for conduct unbecoming

27. November 2007 0
Administrative law – Decisions of administrative tribunals – College of Physicians and Surgeons – Disciplinary proceedings – Penalties – Stay of suspension – Judicial review – Statutory provisions – Procedural requirements and fairness Litchfield v. Alberta (College of Physicians and Surgeons), [2007] A.J. No. 1099, Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench, September 28, 2007, R.P. Marceau ...

Dr. Devgan was found guilty of professional misconduct by the Discipline Committee of the College. Following the hearing, Dr. Devgan appealed the decision and the Order of the Discipline Committee was stayed. The College sought to lift the automatic stay of the Order. The court refused to lift the stay so long as Dr. Devgan complied with a number of conditions. Dr. Devgan failed to comply with the court’s conditions and the College once again sought to lift the stay. The College’s motion was granted and Dr. Devgan’s licence to practise was revoked.

27. April 2004 0
Administrative law – Physicians and surgeons – Disciplinary proceedings – Professional misconduct or conduct unbecoming – Public interest – Suspensions – Stay of suspension – Court imposed conditions – Decisions of administrative tribunals – College of Physicians and Surgeons Devgan v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, [2004] O.J. No. 517, Ontario Superior Court of ...

A lawyer (“Pierce”) sought a stay of the penalty arising out of a disciplinary action pending his appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada. The penalty included a suspension, an order to pay costs, and publication of the penalty. The Court of Appeal granted the stay but only with respect to the suspension as it found that Pierce would suffer irreparable harm if the suspension were instituted and Pierce ultimately succeeded in his appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada.

24. September 2002 0
Administrative law – Barristers and solicitors – Disciplinary proceedings – Penalties – Suspension – Stay of suspension Pierce v. Law Society of British Columbia, [2002] B.C.J. No. 2008, British Columbia Court of Appeal, September 5, 2002, Donald J.A. On September 16, 2002, the Law Society issued a citation alleging professional misconduct and conduct unbecoming a ...