The Supreme Court of Canada established a new category of cases to which the correctness standard of review applies

20. September 2022 0
Administrative law – Decisions reviewed – Copyright Board – Judicial review – Statutory powers – Legislative compliance – Jurisdictional questions – Standard of review – Correctness Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada v. Entertainment Software Assn., [2022] S.C.J. No. 30, 2022 SCC 30, Supreme Court of Canada, July 15, 2022, R. Wagner ...

A Minister’s decision to enter into a contract on specific terms is not a “statutory power of decision” for the purposes of judicial review

17. November 2020 0
Administrative law – Decisions reviewed – Minister of Transportation – Jurisdiction to grant Charter remedies – Judicial review application – Appeals – Jurisdiction – Statutory powers – Remedies – Charter relief – Declaratory relief – Labour law – Collective agreements Independent Contractors and Business Association v. British Columbia (Transportation and Infrastructure), [2020] B.C.J. No. 1340, ...

Supreme Court of Canada clarifies that Ontario and BC Class Proceedings Acts allow superior court judges to sit outside their home provinces

24. November 2016 0
The Supreme Court of Canada allowed appeals from the BC and Ontario Courts of Appeal and held that section 12 of the Ontario and BC Class Proceedings Acts allow superior court judges to sit outside their home provinces in certain circumstances. Administrative law – Class proceedings – Courts – Extraprovincial proceedings – Judges – Jurisdiction ...

The BC Supreme Court found the Health Professions Review Board (“HPRB”) committed a reviewable error in the exercise of its statutory powers in relation to the adequacy of a regulatory body’s investigation and reasonableness of its decision

26. July 2016 0
Administrative law – Decisions of administrative tribunals – College of Chiropractors – Health Professions Review Board – Statutory powers – Chiropractors – Competence – Inadequate investigations – Judicial review – Standard of review – Patent unreasonableness – Evidence College of Chiropractors of British Columbia v. Health Professions Review Board, [2016] B.C.J. No. 884, 2016 BCSC ...

Dentist seeks judicial review of College’s actions in negotiating, entering into, and enforcing a settlement agreement with him due to the fact that he was suffering from bipolar disorder at the time

19. November 2015 0
Dentist sought judicial review of College’s actions in negotiating, entering into, and enforcing a settlement agreement with him as he was suffering from bipolar disorder at the time. In the alternative, he sought an order converting the petition to a Supreme Court action. No relief was available in the circumstances under the Judicial Review Procedure ...

The Court declined the Petitioner’s application for a stay of execution against the set-off by the Respondent Ministry of Health against monies allegedly owed by the Petitioner to the Respondent. The Respondent had determined that the Petitioner owed it the sum of $260,000 as a result of an audit by the Ministry of Health, Audit and Investigations Branch, in respect of unsupported or disallowed claims that had been previously paid by the Respondent. The Petitioner filed a petition for judicial review of the decision set out in the Respondent’s final audit report, seeking an interim stay pending the hearing of the petition. As a preliminary matter, the Court noted it had the jurisdiction to issue a stay of execution but declined to do so as the Petitioner had not met the onus of showing it would suffer irreparable harm that could not be compensated in damages if the stay was not granted.

23. December 2014 0
Administrative law – Decisions of administrative tribunals – Ministerial orders – Pharmacists – Billing matters – PharmaCare Enrollment Agreement – Judicial review – Statutory powers – Jurisdiction – Stay of execution – Remedies – Injunctions Northburn Prescriptions Ltd. (c.o.b. Northburn Remedy’s RX) v. British Columbia, [2014] B.C.J. No. 2771, 2014 BCSC 2124, British Columbia Supreme ...

A decision to dismiss Requests for Hearing that had been outstanding for 15 years before the Health Services Appeal and Review Board (the “Board”) to determine whether the licence for an independent health facility ought to be amended to add back the ability to perform vascular ultrasounds, was upheld on a statutory appeal

23. December 2014 0
Administrative law – Decisions of administrative tribunals – Health Professions Appeal and Review Board – Administrative courts – Statutory powers – Permits and licences – Judicial review – Abuse of process – Mootness – Delay – Standard of review – Reasonableness simpliciter B.S.A. Diagnostics Ltd. v. Ontario (Attorney General), [2014] O.J. No. 5035, 2014 ONSC ...

The Federal Court of Appeal overturned a decision which held that a Directive that banned smoking both indoors and outdoors at federal correctional facilities was invalid

24. August 2010 0
Administrative law – Decisions of administrative tribunals – Prison Commissioner – Statutory powers – Prisons – Smoking ban – Judicial review – Compliance with legislation Mercier v. Canada (Correctional Service), [2010] F.C.J. No. 816, 2010 FCA 167, Federal Court of Appeal, June 21, 2010, Nadon, Pelletier and Trudel JJ.A. This was an appeal of a ...

This was an unsuccessfull appeal by appellant (“Lavigne”) of Department of Justice, Assessment Board’s decision not to consider him as a canditate for an employment opportunity

23. February 2010 0
Administrative law – Decisions of administrative tribunals – Abuse of public office – Employment law – Competition for employment – Judicial review – Compliance with legislation – Statutory powers Lavigne v. Canada (Deputy Minister of Justice), [2009] F.C.J. No. 827, 2009 FC 684, Federal Court, July 2, 2009, Shore J. A manager at the Department ...

An appeal by the Defendant St. Paul’s Hospital (the “Hospital”) from dismissal of a motion to strike out a Statement of Claim issued by a surgeon (“Munro”) as disclosing no cause of action was dismissed where the Court held that it was not plain and obvious that Munro’s claim in contract would fail and the Hospital did not establish that the Court should decline jurisdiction to hear the tort claims

25. August 2009 0
Administrative law – Decisions of administrative tribunals – Hospital Appeal Board – Statutory powers – Physicians and surgeons – Hospital privileges – Judicial review – Compliance with legislation – Evidence – Remedies – Alternative remedies Munro v. St. Paul’s Hospital, [2009] B.C.J. No. 1475, British Columbia Court of Appeal, July 24, 2009, I.T. Donald, P.D. Lowry ...