The court held that the application judge had erred by applying a standard of correctness on review of an Acting Park Superintendent’s interpretation of a park management plan and by finding that the Applicant (Respondent on appeal) was denied procedural fairness in relation to its request for use of a private road located in a provincial park. At its highest, the applicable standard for review was reasonableness, and the Superintendent’s interpretation was not unreasonable.
Administrative law – Decisions of administrative tribunals – Park Superintendent – Road access – Judicial review – Standard of review – Reasonableness simpliciter – Procedural requirements and fairness 2016596 Ontario Inc. v. Ontario (Minister of Natural Resources), [2004] O.J. No. 3922, Ontario Court of Appeal, September 28, 2004, Simmons and Armstrong JJ.A. and Lane J. (ad ...