Federal Court of Appeal remits matter to Federal Court to receive evidence concerning late-asserted mandatory exemption for the production of requested records

15. August 2017 0
The Federal Court of Appeal overturned the Federal Court’s decision requiring the production of documents in the hands of a government institution on the basis that the Federal Court refused to hear evidence regarding the government institution’s late assertion of a mandatory exemption for the production of the requested records. The Federal Court of Appeal ...

Alberta Court of Appeal affirms finding of unprofessional conduct and concludes sanction imposed on surveyor was not unreasonable

17. February 2017 0
Appeal from decision of Council of Alberta Land Surveyors’ Association from finding surveyor engaged in unprofessional conduct for removing a survey monument contrary to the provisions of the Land Surveyor’s Act. Administrative law – Conduct unbecoming – Correctness – Council of the Alberta Land Surveyors’ Association – Decisions reviewed – Disciplinary proceedings – Judicial Review – ...

Privacy Commissioner’s decision to order disclosure was unreasonable as it did not take into account solicitor-client privilege

17. January 2017 0
Freedom of information legislation that required a public body to produce records to the Information and Privacy Commissioner “despite…any privilege of the law of evidence” was not sufficiently clear and precise to set aside or permit an infringement of solicitor-client privilege. Administrative law – Compliance with legislation – Correctness – Decisions of administrative tribunals – ...

Supreme Court of Canada clarifies that a statutory right of appeal is not a new category of correctness

20. December 2016 0
The Supreme Court of Canada confirmed that decisions of a tribunal which are subject to a statutory right of appeal are not a new category of correctness, and should not be added to the list of correctness categories enumerated in Dunsmuir. Administrative law – Assessment Review Board – Compliance with legislation – Correctness – Decisions of ...

Generic manufacturers’ applications for a Notice of Compliance did not trigger notice requirements found in Patented Medicine (Notice of Compliance) Regulations

20. December 2016 0
The Federal Court of Appeal allowed the appeals brought by generic drug manufacturers (Teva Canada Limited and Hospira Healthcare Corporation), the Minister of Health, and the Attorney General in respect of a decision from the Federal Court. The Federal Court had allowed applications for judicial review brought by Pfizer Canada Inc. and Janssen Inc. in ...

Applying administrative law principles Ontario Court of Appeal confirmed insurance arbitrator’s decision was unreasonable

26. October 2016 0
Administrative law – Judicial review – Administrative decisions – Arbitration and award – Unreasonableness – Appeals – Standard of review – Correctness – Reasonableness simpliciter – Evidence Intact insurance Co. v. Allstate Insurance Co. of Canada, [2016] O.J. No. 4113, 2016 ONCA 609, Ontario Court of Appeal, August 4, 2016, R.J. Sharpe, H.S. LaForme and ...

Court Ordered Minister of Agriculture to Review Inspector’s Decision to Seize and not return Animals to their Owner

26. October 2016 0
Judicial review from Minister’s review of seizure of animals under Animal Protection Act. Administrative law – Animals – Compliance with legislation – Correctness – Decisions of administrative tribunals – Interpretation – Judicial Review – Ministerial orders – Seizure and disposition of animals – Standard of Review Brennan v. Nova Scotia (Minister of Agriculture), [2015] N.S.J. No. ...

Human rights complaint investigation was sent back to Tribunal for lack of thoroughness

27. September 2016 0
An application for judicial review of the Human Rights Commission’s decision to direct a complaint for further inquiry by the Tribunal following an investigation was granted because the investigation was not sufficiently thorough.  The matter was returned to the investigator with directions. Administrative law – Age – Correctness – Decisions of administrative tribunals – Discrimination ...

The Supreme Court of Canada confirmed that while correctness is the appropriate standard of review for interpretation of the common law and statute, the palpable and overriding error standard applies to a lower court’s interpretation of a contract

Administrative law – Contracts – Interpretation – Legislation – Statutory interpretation – Standard of review – Palpable and overriding error – Correctness Heritage Capital Corp. v. Equitable Trust Co., [2016] S.C.J. No. 19, 2016 SCC 19, Supreme Court of Canada, May 6, 2016, McLachlin C.J. and Abella, Cromwell, Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Wagner, Gascon, Côté and Brown ...

Applicant sought judicial review of the Minister of Agriculture’s review of the seizure of animals under the Animal Protection Act

14. June 2016 0
Judicial review from Minister’s review of seizure of animals under Animal Protection Act. Administrative law – Animals – Compliance with legislation – Correctness – Decisions of administrative tribunals – Interpretation – Judicial Review – Ministerial orders – Seizure and disposition of animals – Standard of Review Brennan v. Nova Scotia (Minister of Agriculture), [2015] N.S.J. No. 239, 2015 ...