Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeal Tribunals’ interpretation of review and recalculation provision imposing a cap on supplement due is reasonable

17. January 2017 0
Administrative law – Decisions of administrative tribunals – Workers Compensation Boards – Workers compensation – Benefits – Statutory provisions – Judicial review – Compliance with legislation – Standard of review – Reasonableness Martin v. Ontario (Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal), [2016] O.J. No. 6159, 2016 ONSC 7364, Ontario Superior Court of Justice – Divisional ...

Applying administrative law principles Ontario Court of Appeal confirmed insurance arbitrator’s decision was unreasonable

26. October 2016 0
Administrative law – Judicial review – Administrative decisions – Arbitration and award – Unreasonableness – Appeals – Standard of review – Correctness – Reasonableness simpliciter – Evidence Intact insurance Co. v. Allstate Insurance Co. of Canada, [2016] O.J. No. 4113, 2016 ONCA 609, Ontario Court of Appeal, August 4, 2016, R.J. Sharpe, H.S. LaForme and ...

The Supreme Court of Canada confirmed that while correctness is the appropriate standard of review for interpretation of the common law and statute, the palpable and overriding error standard applies to a lower court’s interpretation of a contract

26. July 2016 0
Administrative law – Contracts – Interpretation – Legislation – Statutory interpretation – Standard of review – Palpable and overriding error – Correctness Heritage Capital Corp. v. Equitable Trust Co., [2016] S.C.J. No. 19, 2016 SCC 19, Supreme Court of Canada, May 6, 2016, McLachlin C.J. and Abella, Cromwell, Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Wagner, Gascon, Côté and Brown ...

The BC Supreme Court found the Health Professions Review Board (“HPRB”) committed a reviewable error in the exercise of its statutory powers in relation to the adequacy of a regulatory body’s investigation and reasonableness of its decision

26. July 2016 0
Administrative law – Decisions of administrative tribunals – College of Chiropractors – Health Professions Review Board – Statutory powers – Chiropractors – Competence – Inadequate investigations – Judicial review – Standard of review – Patent unreasonableness – Evidence College of Chiropractors of British Columbia v. Health Professions Review Board, [2016] B.C.J. No. 884, 2016 BCSC ...

The petitioner, a pharmacy, in a judicial review petition for an interlocutory injunction, sought two orders in the nature of certiorari quashing the decision of the Ministry of Health: (i) that the petitioner owes $1,392,405.85 to the Province of BC and (ii) to refuse to enroll the pharmacy in the PharmaCare program pursuant to the Pharmaceutical Services Act (“PSA”)

24. March 2016 0
Administrative law – Decisions of administrative tribunals – Ministerial orders – Pharmacists – PharmaCare Enrollment Agreement – Billing matters – Public interest – Judicial review – Procedural requirements and fairness – Remedies – Interlocutory injunctions Community Outreach Pharmacy Ltd. v. British Columbia (Minister of Health), [2015] B.C.J. No. 2919, British Columbia Supreme Court, November 16, ...

The Alberta Court of Appeal allowed an appeal made by a veterinarian from a regulatory order suspending his licence and requiring him to attend addictions treatment on the basis that he was denied procedural fairness

24. March 2016 0
Administrative law – Decisions of administrative tribunals – Veterinary Associations – Veterinarians – Disciplinary proceedings – Competence – Licence to practice – Suspensions – Judicial review – Natural justice – Procedural requirements and fairness – Notice – Disclosure Irwin v. Alberta Veterinary Medical Assn., [2015] A.J. No. 1398, 2015 ABCA 396, Alberta Court of Appeal, ...

The Court denied a vexatious litigant (pharmacist) leave to appeal a decision that denied his reinstatement application for his pharmacy license on the basis that it was an abuse of process and there were no reasonable grounds for it

22. December 2015 0
Administrative law – Decisions of administrative tribunals – College of Pharmacists – Pharmacists – Governance – Disciplinary proceedings – Professional misconduct or conduct unbecoming – Licence to practice – Reinstatement – Judicial review – Appeals – Leave to appeal – Abuse of process – Jurisdiction – Compliance with legislation – Rules and by-laws – Standard ...

A Committee’s decision finding a psychologist/registrant guilty of professional misconduct for failing to use the term “non practicing” in his advertising was upheld by the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal

22. December 2015 0
Administrative law – Decisions of administrative tribunals – College of Psychologists – Psychologists – Governance – Disciplinary proceedings – Professional misconduct or conduct unbecoming – Licence to practice – Unauthorized practice – Advertising – Judicial review – Compliance with legislation – Rules and by-laws – Standard of review – Reasonableness simpliciter – Correctness Sydiaha v. ...

On judicial review, the Applicant argued that procedural fairness was not followed by the Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission. The Court found that the Applicant failed to establish any violation of procedural fairness and therefore dismissed the judicial review application.

22. September 2015 0
Administrative law – Decisions of administrative tribunals – Human Rights Commission – Human Rights complaints – Discrimination – Sexual orientation – Investigations – Judicial review – Evidence – Fresh evidence – admissibility J.D. v. Nova Scotia (Human Rights Commission), [2015] N.S.J. No. 323, 2015 NSSC 225, Nova Scotia Supreme Court, July 29, 2015, J.L. Chipman ...